ANTH 3623: Reconciling justice with anthropology (Semester 1,
2026)
March 23, 2026
Main reading:Demian (2011); Robbins
(2009); Sarma Bhagabati
(2025)
Notes
When judges in a Tiv village settle a case, they are repairing the
tar, the shared territory of one community (Bohannan
2018). They practice just one example of what today people might
call “restorative justice” in which parties in a conflict in the
presence of and with the facilitation of the whole community work to
restore an equilibrium and to create peace (Braithwaite 1999). It
is a kind of judgment without a concept of guilt or innocence, or victim
and perpetrator, at least in the sense of these concepts in a punitive
system of criminal law. Restorative justice is not new and not even
really rare. What if we are wrong to think of it as a cultural
construction of justice? Can there be another kind of justice in which
what is rendered what is due is not people but relationships?
Demian, Melissa. 2011. “`Hybrid Custom’ and Legal Description in
Papua New Guinea.” In Recasting Anthropological Knowledge:
Inspiration and Social Science, edited by Jeanette Edwards and Maja
Petrović-Šteger, 49–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, Joel. 2009. “Recognition, Reciprocity, and Justice:
Melanesian Reflections on the Rights of Relationships.” In
Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era,
edited by Kamari Maxine Clarke and Mark Goodale, 171–90. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657511.010.
Sarma Bhagabati, Dikshit. 2025. “Human Rights as a Claim for
Recognition: Towards an Ecumenical Anthropology of Dignity and
Personhood.”Thesis Eleven 187 (1): 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136241308888.
This site would like to use a cookie to identify related pages based on patterns in user behavior. Your data is anonymous.